Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift

Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of case law on cash gift

Blog Article

refers to a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:

Some sites might specialize in specific areas of legislation, while others offer a broader database. Factors to look at when selecting a website contain the comprehensiveness with the database, the ease of navigation, plus the availability of advanced search options.

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

maintaining the conviction awarded to your appellant reduce the sentence on the appellant from imprisonment for life to 1 already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)

Previous four tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is additionally a well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government organizations in regards to projects that could probably pose a public risk. This case is also noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all foreseeable future public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found within the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the website right to have water free from pollution and contamination is a right to life itself.

The Court viewed as the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the Threat and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.

This case has actually been cited in several subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, as well as the rule of regulation.

Alternative Punishment: In certain cases, the court may well have the discretion to award life imprisonment being an alternative to the death penalty. Life imprisonment involves the offender spending the remainder of their life at the rear of bars without the possibility of parole or early release.

Generally speaking, higher courts will not have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your reduced courts.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement from the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis

dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded into the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )